DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Acura TL vs 2003 Alpina B10 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B10

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B10
AcuraMakeAlpina
TLModelB10
2005Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B10
6,0 s0–100 km/h6,3 s
225 km/hTop speed262 km/h
3210 ccEngine displacement3300 cc
273 HPPower280 HP
323 NmTorque335 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B10
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption10,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B10
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
235/45 R17Tyre size235/40 ZR 18; 265/35 ZR 18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura TLSpecificationAlpina B10
4808 mmLength4775 mm
1835 mmWidth1800 mm
1440 mmHeight1415 mm
1655 KgWeight1540 Kg
2740 mmWheelbase2830 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Acura TL and 2003 Alpina B10 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B10 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…