DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Kia Picanto vs 2016 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 21.25 points.

52.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeRenault
PicantoModelClio
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h6,6 s
175 km/hTop speed235 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
85 HPPower220 HP
120 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank0 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
155/70 R13 75T; 165/60 R14 75H; 175/50 R15 75HTyre size205/40 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3595 mmLength4062 mm
1595 mmWidth1731 mm
1480 mmHeight1448 mm
860-996 KgWeight1204 Kg
2385 mmWheelbase2589 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Kia Picanto and 2016 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 21.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…