DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Kia Picanto vs 2006 Smart Fortwo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Smart Fortwo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.5–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeSmart
PicantoModelFortwo
2004Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats2
5Doors3

Performance

16,3 s0–100 km/h—
150 km/hTop speed135 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement599 cc
60 HPPower45 HP
863 NmTorque70 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank33 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption6 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears6
155/70 R13Tyre size145/65 R15; 175/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3495 mmLength2500 mm
1595 mmWidth1515 mm
1480 mmHeight1549 mm
981 KgWeight805 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase1812 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Kia Picanto and 2006 Smart Fortwo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Smart Fortwo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…