DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Kia Picanto vs 2006 Mazda Laputa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Laputa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.5–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMazda
PicantoModelLaputa
2004Model year2006
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

16,3 s0–100 km/h—
150 km/hTop speed0 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement657 cc
60 HPPower55 HP
863 NmTorque61 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank30 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size165/70 R14 81 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3495 mmLength3395 mm
1595 mmWidth1475 mm
1480 mmHeight1545 mm
981 KgWeight750 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Kia Picanto and 2006 Mazda Laputa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Laputa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…