DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Kia Picanto vs 2005 Chevrolet Metro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.5–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeChevrolet
PicantoModelMetro
2004Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

16,3 s0–100 km/h—
150 km/hTop speed145 km/h
999 ccEngine displacement993 cc
60 HPPower56 HP
863 NmTorque78 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank39 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
155/70 R13Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3495 mmLength3790 mm
1595 mmWidth1590 mm
1480 mmHeight1390 mm
981 KgWeight860 Kg
2370 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Kia Picanto and 2005 Chevrolet Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…