DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Audi A2 vs 2005 Chevrolet Metro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Metro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

55.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AudiMakeChevrolet
A2ModelMetro
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1191 ccEngine displacement993 cc
61 HPPower56 HP
140 NmTorque78 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
34 ltFuel tank39 lt
3,6 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
2,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
3,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
145/80 R14Tyre size155/80 R13
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3826 mmLength3790 mm
1673 mmWidth1590 mm
1553 mmHeight1390 mm
930 KgWeight860 Kg
2405 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Audi A2 and 2005 Chevrolet Metro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Metro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…