DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Kia Optima vs 2009 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
OptimaModelXC70
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
220 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2656 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
193 HPPower175 HP
247 NmTorque420 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
62 ltFuel tank70 lt
13 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears—
215/50 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4838 mm
1805 mmWidth1861 mm
1480 mmHeight1604 mm
1508 KgWeight1742 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Kia Optima and 2009 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…