DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Kia Optima vs 2008 Mercury Milan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mercury Milan

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMercury
OptimaModelMilan
2008Model year2008
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h7,3 s
220 km/hTop speed188 km/h
2656 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
193 HPPower212 HP
247 NmTorque271 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank68 lt
13 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
215/50 R17Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4800 mmLength4862 mm
1805 mmWidth1834 mm
1480 mmHeight1417 mm
1508 KgWeight1535 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2728 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Kia Optima and 2008 Mercury Milan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mercury Milan leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…