DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 BMW 7 Serisi Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

65.5–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeBMW
OptimaModel7 Serisi
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,4 s
0 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2494 ccEngine displacement2497 cc
172 HPPower143 HP
229 NmTorque280 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption11,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption8,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size215/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4722 mmLength4984 mm
1815 mmWidth1862 mm
1410 mmHeight1435 mm
1495 KgWeight1710 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2930 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Optima and 2000 BMW 7 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…