DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Kia Optima vs 2011 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
OptimaModelXC60
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

9,0 s0–100 km/h8,1 s
210 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
201 HPPower215 HP
245 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption6,5 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R18Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4627 mm
1830 mmWidth1891 mm
1455 mmHeight1713 mm
1476 KgWeight1794 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Kia Optima and 2011 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…