DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 Kia Optima vs 2015 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMazda
OptimaModelCX-5
2014Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
194 HPPower192 HP
245 NmTorque256 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
—Urban consumption9,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,0 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4555 mm
1830 mmWidth1840 mm
1455 mmHeight1710 mm
1484 KgWeight1440 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2070 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 Kia Optima and 2015 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…