DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Kia Optima vs 2011 Acura RDX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RDX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura RDX
KiaMakeAcura
OptimaModelRDX
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura RDX
—0–100 km/h7,5 s
0 km/hTop speed195 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2300 cc
194 HPPower240 HP
245 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura RDX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank68 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption11,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura RDX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/55 R17Tyre size235/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationAcura RDX
4845 mmLength4635 mm
1830 mmWidth1870 mm
1455 mmHeight1655 mm
1462 KgWeight1698 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2650 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Kia Optima and 2011 Acura RDX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RDX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…