DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Kia Optima vs 2010 Volvo XC70 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
OptimaModelXC70
2010Model year2010
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2359 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
194 HPPower175 HP
245 NmTorque420 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,9 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears—
215/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4838 mm
1830 mmWidth1861 mm
1455 mmHeight1604 mm
1462 KgWeight1742 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2815 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Kia Optima and 2010 Volvo XC70 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…