2000 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.4 (151 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Alfa Romeo
156
Alfa Romeo 156 2.4 JTD (136 Hp) 2000Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
KiaMakeAlfa Romeo
OptimaModel156
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2387 cc
151 HPPower136 HP
216 NmTorque304 Nm
4Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption8,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,6 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size205/60R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationAlfa Romeo 156
4722 mmLength4430 mm
1815 mmWidth1745 mm
1410 mmHeight1415 mm
1475 KgWeight1350 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2595 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…