2000 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.4 (151 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Mitsubishi Space Gear Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mitsubishi
Space Gear
Mitsubishi Space Gear 2.4 i 16V GL 4WD (128 Hp) 2000Overall Score66.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi Space Gear
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–66.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Gear
KiaMakeMitsubishi
OptimaModelSpace Gear
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Gear
0 km/hTop speed150 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2350 cc
151 HPPower128 HP
216 NmTorque206 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Gear
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption16,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Gear
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size195/80 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Gear
4722 mmLength4655 mm
1815 mmWidth1695 mm
1410 mmHeight1855 mm
1475 KgWeight1815 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Mitsubishi Space Gear approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi Space Gear leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…