2000 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.4 (151 Hp) 2000Overall Score65.5/100
2000 Kia Optima vs 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mercedes-Benz
ML
Mercedes-Benz ML 163.136) 2000Overall Score65.25/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
65.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMercedes-Benz ML
KiaMakeMercedes-Benz
OptimaModelML
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMercedes-Benz ML
—0–100 km/h12,3 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2295 cc
151 HPPower150 HP
216 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMercedes-Benz ML
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank83 lt
—Urban consumption17,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
—Average consumption12,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationMercedes-Benz ML
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size225/75 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMercedes-Benz ML
4722 mmLength4587 mm
1815 mmWidth1833 mm
1410 mmHeight1802 mm
1475 KgWeight1855 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2820 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Kia Optima and 2000 Mercedes-Benz ML approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…