DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Kia Optima vs 2015 Great Wall Steed Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeGreat Wall
OptimaModelSteed
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typePick-up
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,4 s0–100 km/h12,7 s
190 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
150 HPPower139 HP
180 NmTorque305 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank70 lt
5,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—Drivetrain4x4
—Gears6
—Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength5040 mm
1830 mmWidth1800 mm
1455 mmHeight1730 mm
1587-1648 KgWeight—
2795 mmWheelbase3050 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Kia Optima and 2015 Great Wall Steed approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…