2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Toyota RAV4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Toyota
RAV4
Toyota RAV4 2.0 16V D-4D (116 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Toyota RAV4
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
KiaMakeToyota
OptimaModelRAV4
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
11,5 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
207 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
136 HPPower116 HP
181 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank57 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption5,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size215/70 R16; 235/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationToyota RAV4
4720 mmLength3850-3865 mm
1815 mmWidth1735-1785 mm
1410 mmHeight1695-1700 mm
1415-1496 KgWeight1315-1425 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2280 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Toyota RAV4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota RAV4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…