DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Peugeot 406 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakePeugeot
OptimaModel406
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
207 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
136 HPPower110 HP
181 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank0 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption—
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4720 mmLength—
1815 mmWidth—
1410 mmHeight—
1415-1496 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Peugeot 406 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…