2003 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0i 16V (136 Hp) 2003Overall Score56.5/100
2003 Kia Optima vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.0 i 16V ZX3 (131 Hp) 2003Overall Score57.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
KiaMakeFord
OptimaModelFocus
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
11,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
207 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
136 HPPower131 HP
181 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,6 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
7,1 ltExtra-urban consumption7,1 lt
9,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14; 205/60 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
4720 mmLength4270 mm
1815 mmWidth1699 mm
1410 mmHeight1430 mm
1415-1496 KgWeight1200 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2616 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Kia Optima and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…