DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Kia Optima vs 2016 Ford Fusion Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 5 points.

80.75–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeFord
OptimaModelFusion
2015Model year2016
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,2 s
0 km/hTop speed244 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
278 HPPower245 HP
365 NmTorque373 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption11,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,5 lt
—Average consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/45 R18Tyre size235/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4872 mm
1830 mmWidth1852 mm
1455 mmHeight1478 mm
1573 KgWeight1599 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Kia Optima and 2016 Ford Fusion approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 5 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…