DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Kia Optima vs 2015 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Octavia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeSkoda
OptimaModelOctavia
2012Model year2015
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,7 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
278 HPPower230 HP
365 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
9 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4685 mm
1830 mmWidth1814 mm
1455 mmHeight1449 mm
1433 KgWeight1370 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Kia Optima and 2015 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Octavia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…