2012 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 T-GDI (278 Hp) 2012Overall Score78.75/100
2012 Kia Optima vs 2012 KTM X-Bow Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • KTM
X-Bow
KTM X-Bow 2.0 (240 Hp) 2012Overall Score79.75/100
WINNER
KTM X-Bow
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
78.75–79.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationKTM X-Bow
KiaMakeKTM
OptimaModelX-Bow
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors—
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationKTM X-Bow
—0–100 km/h3,9 s
0 km/hTop speed220 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
278 HPPower240 HP
365 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationKTM X-Bow
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank40 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
9 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationKTM X-Bow
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size205/40 R17; 235/40 R18
YesABS—
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationKTM X-Bow
4845 mmLength3738 mm
1830 mmWidth1915 mm
1455 mmHeight1202 mm
1433 KgWeight790 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Kia Optima and 2012 KTM X-Bow approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, KTM X-Bow leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…