2016 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 T-GDI (245 Hp) 2016Overall Score75.75/100
2016 Kia Optima vs 2016 BMW 4 Serisi Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • BMW
4 Serisi
BMW 4 Serisi 2016Overall Score75.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
75.75–75.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
KiaMakeBMW
OptimaModel4 Serisi
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
4Doors2
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
7,4 s0–100 km/h8,2 s
240 km/hTop speed230 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
245 HPPower184 HP
353 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,8 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
6,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size225/50 R17 94W; 225/45 R18; 255/40 R18; 225/40 R19; 255/35 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationBMW 4 Serisi
4855 mmLength4638 mm
1860 mmWidth1825 mm
1465 mmHeight1384 mm
1580-1680 KgWeight1700 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2810 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Kia Optima and 2016 BMW 4 Serisi approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…