DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Tata Hexa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationTata Hexa
KiaMakeTata
OptimaModelHexa
2017Model year2017
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationTata Hexa
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
156 HPPower150 HP
189 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationTata Hexa
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
1,4 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationTata Hexa
—DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size235/70 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationTata Hexa
4855 mmLength4788 mm
1860 mmWidth1903 mm
1465-1470 mmHeight1791 mm
1815-1880 KgWeight2280 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Tata Hexa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…