2017 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 GDi (205 Hp) 2017Overall Score65.25/100
2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Nissan Rogue Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Nissan
Rogue
Nissan Rogue 2.0 (176 Hp) 2017Overall Score64.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Rogue
KiaMakeNissan
OptimaModelRogue
2017Model year2017
EstateBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Rogue
9,7 s0–100 km/h—
192 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
156 HPPower141 HP
189 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Rogue
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,9 lt
1,4 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationNissan Rogue
4855 mmLength4686 mm
1860 mmWidth1839 mm
1465-1470 mmHeight1740 mm
1815-1880 KgWeight1716-1732 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2705 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Nissan Rogue approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…