DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Great Wall Hover H6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

65.25–64.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeGreat Wall
OptimaModelHover H6
2017Model year2017
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
192 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1996 cc
156 HPPower143 HP
189 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank58 lt
1,4 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—Tyre size225/65 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4855 mmLength4640 mm
1860 mmWidth1825 mm
1465-1470 mmHeight1745 mm
1815-1880 KgWeight—
2805 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Great Wall Hover H6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…