DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Kia Optima vs 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Outlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMitsubishi
OptimaModelOutlander
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
202 km/hTop speed198 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement2360 cc
165 HPPower167 HP
196 NmTorque222 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6GearsCVT
215/55 R17Tyre size225/55 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4695 mm
1830 mmWidth1800 mm
1455 mmHeight1680 mm
1500 KgWeight1505 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Kia Optima and 2015 Mitsubishi Outlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Outlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…