DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Kia Optima vs 2015 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-5

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMazda
OptimaModelCX-5
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,3 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
202 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1999 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
165 HPPower160 HP
196 NmTorque208 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank58 lt
5,7 ltUrban consumption8,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
4,9 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
215/55 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4845 mmLength4555 mm
1830 mmWidth1840 mm
1455 mmHeight1710 mm
1500 KgWeight1375 Kg
2795 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Kia Optima and 2015 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-5 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…