2006 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 CRDi (140 Hp) 2006Overall Score64.75/100
2006 Kia Optima vs 2006 Mazda Roadster Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Mazda
Roadster
Mazda Roadster 2.0 i (170 Hp) 2006Overall Score65.5/100
WINNER
Mazda Roadster
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda Roadster
KiaMakeMazda
OptimaModelRoadster
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeRoadster
5Seats2
4Doors2
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda Roadster
10,4 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower170 HP
305 NmTorque189 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda Roadster
DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda Roadster
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationMazda Roadster
4735 mmLength3995 mm
1805 mmWidth1720 mm
1480 mmHeight1245 mm
1525 KgWeight—
2720 mmWheelbase2330 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Kia Optima and 2006 Mazda Roadster approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda Roadster leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…