DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Kia Optima vs 2006 Honda Edix Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Edix

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeHonda
OptimaModelEdix
2006Model year2006
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats6
4Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h—
201 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1991 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower156 HP
305 NmTorque192 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank58 lt
8,1 ltUrban consumption—
5,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,0 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
205/60 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABS—

Dimensions

4735 mmLength4285 mm
1805 mmWidth1795 mm
1480 mmHeight1610 mm
1525 KgWeight1440 Kg
2720 mmWheelbase2680 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Kia Optima and 2006 Honda Edix approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Edix leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…