2002 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 2.0 (149 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Kia Optima vs 2002 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 2.3 i 16V ZXW (147 Hp) 2002Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Ford Focus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
KiaMakeFord
OptimaModelFocus
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2261 cc
149 HPPower147 HP
193 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption10,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationFord Focus
4745 mmLength4450 mm
1815 mmWidth1699 mm
1420 mmHeight1430 mm
1335 KgWeight1315 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Kia Optima and 2002 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…