DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Kia Optima vs 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Cavalier

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeChevrolet
OptimaModelCavalier
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement2198 cc
149 HPPower141 HP
193 NmTorque203 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/70 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4580 mm
1815 mmWidth1712 mm
1420 mmHeight1351 mm
1335 KgWeight1215 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2645 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Kia Optima and 2002 Chevrolet Cavalier approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Cavalier leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…