DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Skoda Octavia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Optima

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

69.75–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeSkoda
OptimaModelOctavia
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
203 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
141 HPPower115 HP
340 NmTorque250 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption4,6 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4855 mmLength4670 mm
1860 mmWidth1814 mm
1465 mmHeight1461 mm
1515 KgWeight1305 kg
—Luggage capacity568 lt
2805 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

Kia Optima

No additional feature records are available.

Skoda OctaviaDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip Computerstart-stopArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsManual Air ConditioningIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsAlloy WheelsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Skoda Octavia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…