DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Renault Talisman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Talisman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeRenault
OptimaModelTalisman
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
203 km/hTop speed215 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
141 HPPower150 HP
340 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank51 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears7 EDC
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size215/60 R16 95H; 225/55 R17 101W; 245/45 R18 100W; 245/40 R19 98Y
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4855 mmLength4849 mm
1860 mmWidth1868 mm
1465 mmHeight1463 mm
1515 KgWeight1430 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2808 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Renault Talisman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Talisman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…