2017 • Kia
Optima
Kia Optima 1.7 CRDi (141 Hp) 2017Overall Score69.75/100
2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Renault Kadjar Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Renault
Kadjar
Renault Kadjar Icon 2017 1.6 dCi 130 HPOverall Score69.5/100
WINNER
Kia Optima
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
69.75–69.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
KiaMakeRenault
OptimaModelKadjar
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats—
4Doors—
Performance
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
10,0 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
203 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
141 HPPower130 HP
340 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
DieselFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank55 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption5,4 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption4,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
—TransmissionManual
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size17
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia OptimaSpecificationRenault Kadjar
4855 mmLength4449 mm
1860 mmWidth1836 mm
1465 mmHeight1607 mm
1515 KgWeight1536 kg
—Luggage capacity472 lt
2805 mmWheelbase—
Additional Features
No additional feature records are available.
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Renault Kadjar approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Optima leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…