DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Kia Optima vs 2017 Nissan X-Trail Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan X-Trail

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeNissan
OptimaModelX-Trail
2017Model year2017
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5/7
4Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
203 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1618 cc
141 HPPower163 HP
340 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption7,9 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4855 mmLength4640 mm
1860 mmWidth1820 mm
1465 mmHeight1715 mm
1515 KgWeight1430-1574 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Kia Optima and 2017 Nissan X-Trail approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan X-Trail leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…