DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Kia Optima vs 2015 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo V40
KiaMakeVolvo
OptimaModelV40
2015Model year2015
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo V40
10,0 s0–100 km/h8,8 s
203 km/hTop speed210 km/h
1685 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
141 HPPower150 HP
340 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo V40
DieselFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank62 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
4,6 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo V40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Kia OptimaSpecificationVolvo V40
4855 mmLength4369 mm
1860 mmWidth1802 mm
1465 mmHeight1445 mm
1515 KgWeight1268 Kg
2805 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Kia Optima and 2015 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…