DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Kia Niro vs 2017 Mini Clubman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mini Clubman

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

67.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeMini
NiroModelClubman
2017Model year2017
CrossoverBody typeEstate
—Seats5
—Doors5

Performance

11,5 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
162 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1580 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
141 HPPower136 HP
265 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

HybridFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank48 lt
4,2 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
3,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x2DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
DCTTransmission—
18Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4355 mmLength4253 mm
1805 mmWidth1800 mm
1545 mmHeight1441 mm
1425 kgWeight1300 Kg
427 ltLuggage capacity—
—Wheelbase2670 mm

Additional Features

Kia NiroDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRTyre Pressure MonitoringTrip ComputerKeyless StartArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorDaytime Running LightsFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsAuto-dimming Rear-view MirrorRain SensorFolding MirrorsUSB PortBluetooth

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Kia Niro and 2017 Mini Clubman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mini Clubman leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…