DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Kia Clarus vs 1999 Kia Clarus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Clarus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeKia
ClarusModelClarus
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,9 s0–100 km/h10,9 s
195 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
133 HPPower133 HP
171 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
13,9 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption8,1 lt
10,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R14Tyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4731 mmLength4750 mm
1770 mmWidth1785 mm
1420 mmHeight1495 mm
1234 KgWeight1300 Kg
2659 mmWheelbase2659 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Kia Clarus and 1999 Kia Clarus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Clarus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…