DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Kia Ceed vs 2012 Toyota Porte Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Ceed

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.25–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeToyota
CeedModelPorte
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h—
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1365 ccEngine displacement1299 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
220 NmTorque123 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank45 lt
5,4 ltUrban consumption—
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16; 225/45 R17Tyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4310 mmLength3990 mm
1780 mmWidth1690 mm
1470 mmHeight1720 mm
1365 KgWeight—
2650 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Kia Ceed and 2012 Toyota Porte approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Ceed leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…