DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Kia Carnival vs 2006 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeOpel
CarnivalModelAntara
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSUV
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,8 s
0 km/hTop speed203 km/h
2902 ccEngine displacement3195 cc
192 HPPower227 HP
343 NmTorque297 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption16,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,9 lt
—Average consumption11,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/60 R17Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength4575 mm
1985 mmWidth1850 mm
1780 mmHeight1704 mm
2205 KgWeight1865 Kg
3020 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Kia Carnival and 2006 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…