DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Kia Carnival vs 2005 Land Rover Range Rover Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeLand Rover
CarnivalModelRange Rover
2006Model year2005
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,6 s
0 km/hTop speed179 km/h
2902 ccEngine displacement2926 cc
170 HPPower177 HP
353 NmTorque390 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank100 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption14,4 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
7,9 ltAverage consumption11,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/60 R17Tyre size255/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4810 mmLength4950 mm
1985 mmWidth1955 mm
1760 mmHeight1860 mm
2140 KgWeight2500 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Kia Carnival and 2005 Land Rover Range Rover approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…