2006 • Kia
Carnival
Kia Carnival 2.9 CRDI (144 Hp) 2006Overall Score67.75/100
2006 Kia Carnival vs 2006 Ford Taurus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2006 • Ford
Taurus
Ford Taurus 3.0 V6 (155 Hp) 2006Overall Score68.5/100
WINNER
Ford Taurus
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Taurus
KiaMakeFord
CarnivalModelTaurus
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Taurus
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2902 ccEngine displacement2986 cc
144 HPPower155 HP
310 NmTorque251 Nm
4Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Taurus
DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank68 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Taurus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
215/65 R15Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia CarnivalSpecificationFord Taurus
4925 mmLength5019 mm
1900 mmWidth1854 mm
1735 mmHeight1425 mm
2078 KgWeight1521 Kg
2905 mmWheelbase2756 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2006 Kia Carnival and 2006 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…