DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Kia Carnival vs 2010 Land Rover Freelander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Carnival

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

73.75–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeLand Rover
CarnivalModelFreelander
2010Model year2010
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,7 s
0 km/hTop speed181 km/h
2199 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
197 HPPower160 HP
436 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
80 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption9,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,2 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
235/60 R17Tyre size215/75 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4810 mmLength4500 mm
1985 mmWidth1910 mm
1760 mmHeight1740 mm
2030 KgWeight1770 Kg
2890 mmWheelbase2660 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Kia Carnival and 2010 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Carnival leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…