DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Acura TL vs 2003 Pontiac Montana Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Pontiac Montana

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–69.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

AcuraMakePontiac
TLModelMontana
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

7,4 s0–100 km/h—
225 km/hTop speed170 km/h
3206 ccEngine displacement3350 cc
228 HPPower187 HP
293 NmTorque285 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank96 lt
—Urban consumption13,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,8 lt
8,7 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
205/60 R16Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4900 mmLength5113 mm
1785 mmWidth1847 mm
1425 mmHeight1730 mm
1575 KgWeight2065 Kg
2745 mmWheelbase3048 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Acura TL and 2003 Pontiac Montana approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Pontiac Montana leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…