DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Kia Cadenza vs 2012 Volvo S80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
CadenzaModelS80
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,8 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2657 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
200 HPPower215 HP
254 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption8,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,7 lt
—Average consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4851 mm
1850 mmWidth1861 mm
1475 mmHeight1493 mm
1551 KgWeight1640 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2835 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Kia Cadenza and 2012 Volvo S80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…