DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Kia Cadenza vs 2011 Volvo V60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Kia Cadenza

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–70.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeVolvo
CadenzaModelV60
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,9 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2657 ccEngine displacement2400 cc
200 HPPower205 HP
254 NmTorque420 Nm
6Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
70 ltFuel tank67 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,0 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4628 mm
1850 mmWidth1865 mm
1475 mmHeight1484 mm
1551 KgWeight1582 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Kia Cadenza and 2011 Volvo V60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…