DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Kia Cadenza vs 2009 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

71.5–72.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

KiaMakeSubaru
CadenzaModelForester
2009Model year2009
SedanBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
2657 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
200 HPPower171 HP
254 NmTorque229 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
70 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4965 mmLength4560 mm
1850 mmWidth1780 mm
1475 mmHeight1700 mm
1551 KgWeight1495 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Kia Cadenza and 2009 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…