2012 • Kia
Cadenza
Kia Cadenza 2.7 V6 (166 Hp) 2012Overall Score68.5/100
2012 Kia Cadenza vs 2012 Volvo S40 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Volvo
S40
Volvo S40 2.5i T5 (230 Hp) 2012Overall Score67.75/100
WINNER
Kia Cadenza
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo S40
KiaMakeVolvo
CadenzaModelS40
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo S40
—0–100 km/h7,2 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2657 ccEngine displacement2521 cc
166 HPPower230 HP
246 NmTorque320 Nm
6Cylinders5
Fuel & Consumption
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo S40
PetrolFuel typePetrol
85 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption13,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption9,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo S40
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Kia CadenzaSpecificationVolvo S40
4965 mmLength4476 mm
1850 mmWidth1770 mm
1475 mmHeight1454 mm
1574 KgWeight1478 Kg
2845 mmWheelbase2640 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Kia Cadenza and 2012 Volvo S40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Kia Cadenza leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…